What’s New in Alzheimer’s Research 2013 (Part 1)

Unlike scientific meetings that focus on a particular protein, pathway, or disease, the one that drew some 150 researchers to San Francisco 15-17 April 2013 featured an unusually broad array of topics from nitty-gritty molecular to bird’s-eye conceptual. “From Science to Therapeutics: The Best Way Forward” was the catch-all theme for this annual meeting sponsored jointly by the Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, and the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn. Their annual meetings alternate between sites. Last year’s workshop in Germany explored the role of synapses in neurodegenerative disease. The inaugural GIND/DZNE event in 2011 covered tau and tauopathies (see ARF conference series).

Lennart Mucke at the Gladstone Institute and Pierluigi Nicotera of the DZNE organized this year’s meeting with the complexity of AD in mind.

“We deliberately brought together investigators pursuing diverse leads and strategies to comprehensively address the challenges posed by Alzheimer’s disease,” Mucke told Alzforum.

In addition, the organizers chose to separate presentations on similar themes and approaches, rather than cluster them together.

“We did this to keep the audience engaged at all times and to prevent different groups from ‘tuning out’ during talks that fall outside their immediate areas of interest,” Mucke said.

In addition to new data on the physiological function of β-secretases and novel efforts to co-opt a longevity gene, attendees heard a handful of talks on therapeutic approaches that mobilize protein quality control mechanisms to keep amyloidosis in check. One of those promotes ubiquitin-proteasome degradation to counteract pathogenesis. Several others presented at the meeting expand or tweak proteostasis mechanisms to help rid cells of misfolded proteins.

Li Gan of the Gladstone Institute explores how acetylation and ubiquitination contribute to tauopathies by controlling tau degradation. Gan and colleagues previously reported that tau can be acetylated in cultured cells and mice that model tauopathies. They detected acetylation in AD brains at early Braak stages and showed that this post-translational modification keeps protein degradation machinery from clearing tau out of cells (see ARF related news story on Min et al., 2010). More recently, Virginia Lee and John Trojanowski at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, as well as Gan, reported finding acetylated tau in human tauopathies (see ARF related news story and Irwin et al., 2012).

In San Francisco, Gan discussed her lab’s latest work, showing that acetylated tau can impair dendritic sorting and microtubule dynamics. Her lab generated antibodies to acetylated tau and used them to map three acetylation sites—two in tau’s microtubule-binding region and one in its amino-terminal “projection domain,” which seems to determine microtubule spacing.

The researchers identified the acetylation sites from AD brain extract using mass spectrometry. One of them—but not other residues in tau’s microtubule-binding domain—drives proteasome-mediated tau degradation, Gan reported. In collaboration with Dan Finley at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Gan found that a small molecule inhibitor of the deubiquitinase USP14 enhanced proteasome activity and degradation of tau in primary rat neurons expressing human tau. Conversely, the researchers found no such protection in neurons expressing an acetyl-mimic tau that cannot be ubiquitinated at the critical site. Furthermore, transgenic mice expressing this tau mutant in the hippocampus were hyperactive and did not adjust properly to their surroundings in an open field test that measures anxiety, Gan said.

To explore mechanisms underlying the behavioral impairment of this acetyl mimic, the researchers used fluorophores to label and track tau’s movement on microtubules in primary neurons. They found that the acetyl-mimic tau crossed the axon initial segment—a specialized membrane region where neurons initiate axon potentials—more readily than wild-type tau. “We think acetylation at the microtubule-binding domain makes tau hyperdynamic, missorting it to the somatodendritic compartment,” Gan said.

With an emerging picture of how tau acetylation endangers neurons, the Gladstone scientists are also exploring therapeutic approaches that block the histone acetyltransferase p300, an enzyme they determined to acetylate tau in their 2010 study. They are screening for additional p300-blocking molecules, and plan to generate conditional p300 knockouts and cross those with AD and tauopathy mouse models, Gan said.

However, p300 may not be the only tau acetylase. In an intriguing twist, Lee and colleagues at UPenn reported last month that tau can acetylate itself, identifying key cysteine residues in the microtubule-binding domain that are involved in the catalytic activity (Cohen et al., 2013). Gan and others found the data interesting, but said future work is needed to validate the in-vivo relevance of the auto-acetylation, and determine if it correlates with human disease progression.

Exactly what tau’s own acetylase activity contributes is still nebulous, but recent work by Gan and William Seeley at UCSF raises the possibility that tau might require acetylation to become toxic. Using a monoclonal antibody specific for tau acetylated at K274, the researchers probed 22 brain samples from people with AD and eight other tauopathies. They detected acetylated tau ac-K274 in all cases except argyrophilic grain disease (AGD)—a rare condition most often seen in people with long-lasting amnestic mild cognitive impairment that does not progress clinically. “The fact that [the AGD cases] are negative for tau ac-K274 is consistent with the notion that that tau acetylation may be required to accelerate tau toxicity,” Gan noted in an e-mail to Alzforum.

Proteostasis to the Rescue?
The theme of protein degradation also figured prominently in a presentation by Jeff Kelly of Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, who described enlisting the unfolded protein response (UPR), a signaling pathway activated when misfolded proteins accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum. The concept is simple, in theory: Get the system to degrade mutant proteins while still properly folding the wild-type. In practice, this may be hard to achieve, said Kelly, because the UPR activation turns on three transcription factors that each drive expression of distinct but overlapping sets of regulators that control protein degradation. Researchers are unsure which transcriptional program targets amyloidogenic proteins, such as those implicated in neurodegenerative diseases.

Kelly, together with Scripps colleague Luke Wiseman, devised a way to produce two UPR-associated transcription factors—X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6)—at physiological levels within the same cell. They turned on XBP1 using a conventional tetracycline-based promoter. To raise ATF6 levels in the cell, the scientists attached the transcription factor to a mutated variant of E. coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which does not fold properly. Normally, the cell’s proteosomal degradation system makes quick work of ATF6-DHFR fusion proteins because they are highly unstable. However, add some trimethoprim, a molecule that stabilizes the DHFR domain, and the chimera accumulates to high enough levels to trigger transcription of ATF-6 target genes.

Using whole-genome arrays and proteomics, the scientists looked in HEK293 cells for genes upregulated after activating XBP1, ATF6, or both transcription factors. XBP1 turned on 180 genes in a variety of ER proteostasis pathways, whereas ATF6 upregulated a smaller subset. Specifically, they found that transthyretin (TTR)—the amyloidogenic protein that causes familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) and related diseases—was controlled principally by the ATF6 arm. Normal cellular secretion of misfolded, toxic TTR dropped 40 percent when ATF6 target genes were activated but held steady when XBP1-driven transcription was turned on. Wild-type TTR and other endogenous proteins were unaffected by activation of either transcriptional program. “Activating ATF6 target genes enhanced the cell’s ability to maintain quality control,” Kelly said.

Kelly hopes the findings will energize drug development by offering a way “to discern whether a given stress response pathway will be useful for ameliorating a given disease,” he said. The system “allows you to express a transcriptional factor at physiological levels and ask if this is something you would like to go after with a drug-like molecule.”

Switching gears from proteasomal degradation of aggregation-prone proteins, Kelly updated the audience on the long-term efficacy of tafamidis—a drug that stabilizes the normal tetramer adopted by transthyretin. Marketed by Pfizer as a treatment for FAP, tafamidis (trade name Vyndaqel®) prevents transthyretin from breaking into monomers, which can misfold and then misassemble into amyloid (see ARF related news story on Alhamadsheh et al., 2011). Others are using similar approaches to develop therapeutic compounds that target superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) in AD, Kelly told Alzforum. However, the approach is less likely to work for amyloid-β or tau. “Generally speaking, you need a protein that adopts a well-defined, folded structure to fashion high-affinity stabilizing ligands,” Kelly said.

The European Medicines Agency approved tafamidis in 2011, making it the first therapy to successfully treat a disease by blocking amyloid formation (see ARF related news story). In the U.S., Pfizer submitted a new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration that same year but the agency’s advisory committee did not issue an approvable letter after its meeting in May 2012. Under the U.S. Orphan Drug Act, treatments for rare diseases in principle can gain approval based on positive results in a single trial, if the trial uses a surrogate biomarker that is likely to predict clinical efficacy. This latter point is still being disputed.

Kelly and colleagues have developed and patented an ELISA that they say specifically recognizes transthyretin oligomers, the presumed molecular culprit in FAP. Using this assay to screen human blood samples, the researchers distinguished FAP patients from their spouse controls (100 people total) with 100 percent accuracy. In addition, oligomer levels fell more than 50 percent after six months of treatment with tafamidis, Kelly said. He hopes the new data will enable the FDA to approve tafamidis without requiring a second FAP trial.

Jason Gestwicki, who moved last month from the University of Michigan to the University of California, San Francisco, presented his group’s latest work on small molecules targeting the molecular chaperone HSP70. The ADP-bound form of HSP70 binds tightly to misfolded proteins, preventing them from interacting with, and potentially corrupting, properly folded forms. Gestwicki worked with Chad Dickey at the University of South Florida, Tampa, to see if this strategy might work for tauopathies, which are marked by buildup of pathological tau aggregates. The researchers screened for small molecules that trap HSP70 in its ADP-bound state and, in doing so, promote tau degradation (see Evans et al., 2010).

From those screens came MKT-077, an anti-cancer compound that entered Phase 1 testing in the 1960s but was later abandoned because it caused kidney damage. MKT-077 potently reduced tau levels in neuronal cultures from Tg4510 tauopathy mice. Furthermore, the compound seemed to improve synaptic function, driving up long-term potentiation when administered to brain slices from these animals, said Gestwicki. He reported these data in the April 19 Biological Psychiatry (Abisambra et al., 2013; see also Rousaki et al., 2011).

In a separate study done in collaboration with University of Michigan colleague Andrew Lieberman, Gestwicki reported that an MKT-077 analogue curbs neurotoxicity in a fly model of spinobulbar muscular atrophy, also known as Kennedy’s disease (Wang et al., 2013). In this inherited motor neuron disorder, expanded polyglutamine repeats in the androgen receptor (AR) cause the protein to misfold and aggregate. Similar to MKT-077’s tau-reducing effects, this compound appears to relieve toxicity by stabilizing AR binding to HSP90 and HSP70, thereby promoting the receptor’s degradation.

While these data demonstrate proof of principle, MKT-077 and its analogues have a major shortcoming—they do not cross the mammalian blood-brain barrier. However, last month Gestwicki and colleagues reported their first brain-penetrant analogue and showed that it reduced levels of phosphorylated tau in cultured brain slices (Miyata et al., 2013). “We are changing the way tau is recognized by the system,” Gestwicki said.

“The big question we need to address next is whether this approach is safe,” Gestwicki noted. “Do other proteins (besides tau and androgen receptor) get degraded by these molecules? And what are the potential side effects?” His lab is working to address these issues.

This is Part 1 of a four-part series.

Citation

 

How Most Alzheimer’s Drugs Sharpen Brain Performance

Scientists at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute have discovered how the predominant class of Alzheimer’s pharmaceuticals might sharpen the brain’s performance

One factor even more important than the size of a television screen is the quality of the signal it displays. Having a life-sized projection of Harry Potter dodging a Bludger in a Quidditch match is of little use if the details are lost to pixilation.

The importance of transmitting clear signals, however, is not relegated to the airwaves. The same creed applies to the electrical impulses navigating a human brain. Now, new research has shown that one of the few drugs approved for the treatment ofAlzheimer’s disease helps patients by clearing up the signals coming in from the outside world.

The discovery was made by a team of researchers led by Rosalyn Moran, an assistant professor at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute. Her study indicates that cholinesterase inhibitors – a class of drugs that stop the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine – allow signals to enter the brain with more precision and less background noise.

“Increasing the levels of acetylcholine appears to turn your fuzzy, old analog TV signal into a shiny, new, high-definition one,” said Moran, who holds an appointment as an assistant professor in the Virginia Tech College of Engineering. “And the drug does this in the sensory cortices. These are the workhorses of the brain, the gatekeepers, not the more sophisticated processing regions – such as the prefrontal cortex – where one may have expected the drugs to have their most prominent effect.”

Alzheimer’s disease affects more than 35 million people worldwide – a number expected to double every 20 years, leading to more than 115 million cases by 2050. Of the five pharmaceuticals approved to treat the disease by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, four are cholinesterase inhibitors.

Although it is clear that the drugs increase the amount of acetylcholine in the brain, why this improves Alzheimer’s symptoms has been unknown. If scientists understood the mechanisms and pathways responsible for improvement, they might be able to tailor better drugs to combat the disease, which costs more than $200 billion annually in the United States alone.

In the new study, Moran recruited 13 healthy young adults and gave them doses of galantamine, one of the cholinesterase inhibitors commonly prescribed to Alzheimer’s patients. Two electroencephalographs were taken – one with the drugs and one without – as the participants listened to a series of modulating tones while focusing on a simple concentration task.

The researchers were looking for differences in neural activity between the two drug states in response to surprising changes in the sound patterns that the participants were hearing.

The scientists compared the results with computer models built on a Bayesian brain theory, known as the Free Energy Principle, which is a leading theory that describes the basic rules of neuronal communication and explains the creation of complex networks.

The theory hypothesizes that neurons seek to reduce uncertainty, which can be modeled and calculated using free energy molecular dynamics. Connecting tens of thousands of neurons behaving in this manner produces the probability machine that we call a brain.

Moran and her colleagues compiled 10 computer simulations based on the different effects that the drugs could have on the brain. The model that best fit the results revealed that the low-level wheels of the brain early on in the neural networking process were the ones benefitting from the drugs and creating clearer, more precise signals.

“When people take these drugs you can imagine the brain bathed in them,” Moran said. “But what we found is that the drugs don’t have broad-stroke impacts on brain activity. Instead, they are working very specifically at the cortex’s entry points, gating the signals coming into the network in the first place.”

Citation

 

Problems Processing Everyday Events Linked To Older Adults’ Memory Lapses

Some memory problems common to older adults may stem from an inability to segment daily life into discrete experiences, according to a new study published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

The study suggests that problems processing everyday events may be the result of age-related atrophy to a part of the brain called the medial temporal lobe (MTL).

“When you think back on what you did yesterday, you don’t just press ‘play’ and watch a continuous stream of 24 hours,” says psychological scientist Heather Bailey of Washington University in St. Louis, who led the study. “Your brain naturally chunks the events in your day into discrete parts.”

Bailey and her colleagues hypothesized that older adults may have difficulty with memory for everyday events because they don’t segment them in the same way as they’re happening.

lobesIn the study, older adults – some of whom had Alzheimer’s type dementia - watched short movies of people doing everyday tasks, such as a woman making breakfast or a man building a Lego ship. They were told to separate the movie into chunks by pressing a button whenever they thought one part of the activity in the movie was ending and a new part was beginning.

Afterward, the researchers asked the older adults to recall what happened in the movie. They also measured the size of the older adults’ MTL using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

“The older adults who showed atrophy in the MTL weren’t as good at remembering the everyday activities, and they weren’t as good at segmenting and chunking the events as they were happening,” says Bailey. “MTL size accounted for a huge portion of the relationship that we saw between participants’ ability to segment and their memory for the events.”

These findings suggest that the characteristic forgetfulness of the aging mind isn’t just a problem with recalling memories later, but also with how we view and chunk events as they unfold, a process that depends on MTL functioning.

In light of this, focusing on how to better form new memories may be one way to improve older adults’ memory for everyday events, even for those adults who have clinical diagnoses like Alzheimer’s.

Alzheimer’s disease attacks the MTL in the early stages of the disease,” says Bailey. “But even with MTL atrophy you may be able to train people to chunk better, which might help them to remember their everyday activities better, too.”

As part of their future research, Bailey and colleagues hope to further investigate the link between event perception and memory to see if they can combat memory impairments in older adults.

Citation

 

Missing Link in Signals Contributes to Neurodegeneration

In many neurodegenerative diseases the neurons of the brain are over-stimulated and this leads to their destruction. After many failed attempts and much scepticism this process was finally shown last year to be a possible basis for treatment in some patients with stroke. But very few targets for drugs to block this process are known.

In a new highly detailed study, researchers have discovered a previously missing link between over-stimulation and destruction of brain tissue, and shown that this might be a target for future drugs. This research, led by the A. I. Virtanen Institute at the University of Eastern Finland in collaboration with scientists from Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne and the company Xigen Pharma AG, was published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

What is this missing link? We have known for years that over-stimulated neurons produce nitric oxide molecules. Although this can activate a signal for destruction of cells, the small amount of nitric oxide produced cannot alone explain the damage to the brain. The team now show that a protein called NOS1AP links the nitric oxide that is produced to the damage that results.. NOS1AP binds an initiator of cell destruction called MKK3 and also moves within the cell to the source of nitric oxide when cells are over-activated.. The location of these proteins in cells causes them to convert the over-stimulation signal into a cell destruction response. The team designed a chemical that prevents NOS1AP from binding the source of nitric oxide. This reduces the cell destruction response in cells of the brain and as a result it limits brain lesions in rodents.

This translational research was funded mainly by the Academy of Finland, the European Union and the University of Eastern Finland and used the recently developed high-throughput imaging facilities at the A. I. Virtanen Institute. The researchers hope that continuation of their work could lead to improved treatments for diseases such as stroke, epilepsy and chronic conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. As NOS1AP is associated with schizophrenia, diabetes and sudden cardiac death, future research in this area may assist the treatment of a wider range of diseases.

Citation

Link Discovered between Plaques and Tangles in Alzheimer’s Disease

A new study from researchers at the University of Florida may have uncovered a critical factor that drives the relentless progression of Alzheimer’s disease - a discovery that could eventually slow its progression.

For more than 15 years, scientists have known that two types of brain lesions form in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, one type of lesion forming only after the other. David R. Borchelt, Ph.D., a professor of neuroscience, and Guilian Xu, Ph.D., an assistant research scientist at the UF College of Medicine, have used a mouse model to find a potential explanation for how the first type of brain lesion may trigger the second. They report their findings in the current issue of the journal Human Molecular Genetics.

“Understanding how this sequence of events works is thought to be critical and could lead to new therapeutic approaches,” said Borchelt, director of the SantaFe HealthCare Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at UF and the McKnight Brain Institute.

The lesion that appears first is an amyloid plaque, an incorrectly folded protein structure that forms when a small peptide called the amyloid-beta peptide clumps together. However, scientists have known that amyloid alone does not produce Alzheimer’s disease, and all patients with symptoms have a second type of brain lesion called a neurofibrillary tangle. This second lesion appears later in the disease, and as more of these lesions develop, patient symptoms get worse.

Finding an explanation for the sequential appearance of these lesions has challenged scientists, but understanding how the amyloid plaques trigger the tangles could help scientists devise ways to slow disease progression.

The explanation lies at the heart of how cells function. All cells produce proteins, the molecular workhorses of the cell. Proteins have specific, three-dimensional shapes critical to proper function. This is so important that large amounts of cell energy go into making correctly folded proteins and eliminating incorrectly folded ones. The study by the Borchelt laboratory provides evidence that the abnormal accumulation of the amyloid peptide in the brain that produces the plaque lesions also interferes with brain cells’ ability to keep proteins correctly folded.

“This deficiency in cell function could set the stage for allowing the formation of the neurofibrillary tangles that seem to be the key pathology to symptoms,” Borchelt said.

These tangles form when a protein called tau loses its normal shape and folds into a shape that allows it to bind to other tau proteins. This becomes a runaway process that fills the cell with abnormally shaped tau clumps that produce the tangles.

In recent years, pharmaceutical and biotech companies have begun to look for drugs that could stimulate better protein folding in brain cells. The study by Xu suggests that these companies may be on the right track. Borchelt cautions that more work is needed to fully understand how amyloid pathology is linked to the tangle pathology, but this recent study offers a new avenue of investigation that could lead to a clearer picture.

Citation

 

Turning Alzheimer’s Fuzzy Signals Into High Definition

Scientists at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute have discovered how the predominant class of Alzheimer’s pharmaceuticals might sharpen the brain’s performance.

One factor even more important than the size of a television screen is the quality of the signal it displays. Having a life-sized projection of Harry Potter dodging a Bludger in a Quidditch match is of little use if the details are lost to pixilation.

The importance of transmitting clear signals, however, is not relegated to the airwaves. The same creed applies to the electrical impulses navigating a human brain. Now, new research has shown that one of the few drugs approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease helps patients by clearing up the signals coming in from the outside world.

The discovery was made by a team of researchers led by Rosalyn Moran, an assistant professor at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute. Her study indicates that cholinesterase inhibitors — a class of drugs that stop the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine — allow signals to enter the brain with more precision and less background noise.

“Increasing the levels of acetylcholine appears to turn your fuzzy, old analog TV signal into a shiny, new, high-definition one,” said Moran, who holds an appointment as an assistant professor in the Virginia Tech College of Engineering. “And the drug does this in the sensory cortices. These are the workhorses of the brain, the gatekeepers, not the more sophisticated processing regions — such as the prefrontal cortex — where one may have expected the drugs to have their most prominent effect.”

Alzheimer’s disease affects more than 35 million people worldwide — a number expected to double every 20 years, leading to more than 115 million cases by 2050. Of the five pharmaceuticals approved to treat the disease by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, four are cholinesterase inhibitors. Although it is clear that the drugs increase the amount of acetylcholine in the brain, why this improves Alzheimer’s symptoms has been unknown. If scientists understood the mechanisms and pathways responsible for improvement, they might be able to tailor better drugs to combat the disease, which costs more than $200 billion annually in the United States alone.

In the new study, Moran recruited 13 healthy young adults and gave them doses of galantamine, one of the cholinesterase inhibitors commonly prescribed to Alzheimer’s patients. Two electroencephalographs were taken — one with the drugs and one without — as the participants listened to a series of modulating tones while focusing on a simple concentration task.

The researchers were looking for differences in neural activity between the two drug states in response to surprising changes in the sound patterns that the participants were hearing.

The scientists compared the results with computer models built on a Bayesian brain theory, known as the Free Energy Principle, which is a leading theory that describes the basic rules of neuronal communication and explains the creation of complex networks.

The theory hypothesizes that neurons seek to reduce uncertainty, which can be modeled and calculated using free energy molecular dynamics. Connecting tens of thousands of neurons behaving in this manner produces the probability machine that we call a brain.

Moran and her colleagues compiled 10 computer simulations based on the different effects that the drugs could have on the brain. The model that best fit the results revealed that the low-level wheels of the brain early on in the neural networking process were the ones benefitting from the drugs and creating clearer, more precise signals.

“When people take these drugs you can imagine the brain bathed in them,” Moran said. “But what we found is that the drugs don’t have broad-stroke impacts on brain activity. Instead, they are working very specifically at the cortex’s entry points, gating the signals coming into the network in the first place.”

Citation

 

New Perspective Needed for Role of Major Alzheimer’s Gene

Scientists’ picture of how a gene strongly linked to Alzheimer’s disease harms the brain may have to be revised, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have found.

People with harmful forms of the APOE gene have up to 12 times the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease compared with those who have other variations of the gene.

Many researchers believe that the memory loss and cognitive problems of Alzheimer’s result from the buildup over many years of brain amyloid plaques. The plaques are made mostly of a sticky substance called amyloid beta.

plaques_and_tangles_borderFor years, researchers have thought that the APOE gene increases Alzheimer’s risk by producing a protein that binds to amyloid beta. Scientists thought that this bond could make it easier for plaques to form.

But in a new study now available online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington University researchers show that APOE and amyloid beta don’t bind together in cerebrospinal fluid and in fluids present outside cells grown in dishes. This means they are unlikely to bind together in the fluids circulating in the brain. The cerebrospinal fluid was taken from people who were cognitively normal but have forms of APOE that increase the risk of Alzheimer’s.

“This is the first time we’ve looked at naturally produced APOE and amyloid beta to see if and how much they bind together, and we found that they have very little interaction in the fluids bathing the brain,” said David M. Holtzman, MD, the Andrew B. and Gretchen P. Jones Professor and head of neurology. “This suggests that we may need to rethink any therapeutic strategies that target APOE to slow amyloid plaque accumulation and Alzheimer’s.”

According to Holtzman, leading Alzheimer’s researchers recently agreed that targeting APOE is a promising approach both for gaining a better understanding of and improving treatments for Alzheimer’s. But to do that, scientists must first fully understand how the harmful forms of APOE increase risk of the disease.

APOE is a major player in Alzheimer’s, there’s no question about that,” said Philip Verghese, PhD, a postdoctoral research associate. “We did some additional studies in mice and cell cultures that suggested the APOE protein may be blocking a pathway that normally helps degrade amyloid beta.”

APOE is involved in the metabolism of fats, cholesterol and vitamins throughout the body. Scientists have identified three different forms of the gene that each make a slightly different version of the protein.

One version, APOE 2, produces a protein that significantly reduces Alzheimer’s risk. Another, APOE 4, increases risk. Each person has two copies of the gene, and if both copies are APOE 4, the chance of developing Alzheimer’s rises dramatically.

“About 60 percent of the patients we see in the Alzheimer’s clinics have at least one copy of APOE 4,” Holtzman said. “In contrast, only about 25 percent of cognitively normal 70-year-olds have a copy of APOE 4.”

Verghese tested cerebrospinal fluid samples from people who had either two copies of APOE 4 or two copies of APOE 3, another form of the gene that is not associated with increased Alzheimer’s risk.

“We also found that APOE 2, the protective form of the protein, doesn’t bind to amyloid beta in body fluids,” Verghese said.

In follow-up studies, Verghese showed that APOE and amyloid beta “compete” to bind to a receptor on support cells in the brain known as astrocytes.

“Studies by other researchers have shown that astrocytes can degrade amyloid beta,” Verghese said. “The receptor we identified may be important for getting amyloid beta into the astrocyte so it can be broken down. It’s possible that when the harmful forms of APOE bind to the receptor, this reduces the opportunities for amyloid to be degraded.”

The researchers are planning follow-up studies of the effects of APOE-blocking treatments in mice.

Citation

 

Promising Alzheimer’s Drug Gammagard Fails Key Study

Baxter International Inc. says that a blood product it was testing failed to slow mental decline or to preserve physical function in a major study of 390 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.

The company says that people who received 18 months of infusions with its drug, Gammagard, fared no better than others given infusions of a dummy solution.

Gammagard is immune globulin, natural antibodies culled from donated blood. Researchers thought these antibodies might help remove amyloid, the sticky plaque that clogs patients’ brains, sapping memory and ability to think.

Patients with moderate disease and those with a gene that raises risk of Alzheimer’s who were taking the higher of two doses in the study seemed to benefit, although the study was not big enough to say for sure.

“The study missed its primary endpoints, however we remain interested by the prespecified sub-group analyses” in groups that seemed to benefit, Ludwig Hantson, president of Baxter’s BioScience business, said in a statement.

Gammagard is already sold to treat some blood disorders, and the results of the Alzheimer’s study do not affect those uses. About 35 million people worldwide have dementia, and Alzheimer’s is the most common type. In the U.S., about 5 million have Alzheimer’s. Current medicines such as Aricept and Namenda just temporarily ease symptoms. There is no known cure.

Excitement about Gammagard grew last summer, when researchers reported at a medical conference that the drug had stabilized Alzheimer’s disease for as much as three years in four patients who had been receiving the highest dose of it for three years in the study. People typically go from diagnosis to death in about eight years, so to be stable for so long was considered remarkable.

No new results on the full group of study participants are disappointing, said the study’s leader, Dr. Norman Relkin, head of a memory disorders program at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

“The bar was set very high” for the drug to show improvement, and “there does appear to be a signal” that it helped the two-thirds of patients in the study who had the apoE4 gene that raises the risk of developing Alzheimer’s, as well as those with moderate versus mild disease, Relkin said.

No new side effects were seen in the study. About 5 percent of patients on the drug had a rash and decreases in hemoglobin, which carries oxygen in the blood. There were 17 serious reactions, 12 in the drug group and five in the placebo group.

Full results will be presented in July at an Alzheimer’s conference in Boston.

Meanwhile, other studies are under way to test drugs earlier in the course of the disease. An experimental drug, Eli Lilly & Co.’s solanezumab, showed some promise in that setting in an earlier study.

Citation